The Principles Of Freedom Of An Individual - 934 Words

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION The principle of freedom of an individual is the core tenet of liberalism. The foundation of liberalism is categorized into three. The first is the freedom from arbitrary rule, termed â€Å"negative freedom† which includes freedom of the press, equality before the law, freedom of conscience and right to property. The second set of rights ensures the protection and promotion of the capacity and opportunity for freedom, which is called the â€Å"positive freedom.† Example of such rights are the social and economic rights to health care, education, gainful employment, for human dignity and participation in the society. Thirdly, political rights of democratic representation or participation i.e., right to vote or be voted for to ensure that the other two rights are not infringed on (Kant Political Philosophy, 1993. p. 173). Liberalism today could slightly be different with earlier views as a result of changes in time and history however the fundamental tent of liberty and the ideals of freedom, equality, independence as expressed by Kant remains the same and paramount. Several philosophical views regarding modern political thought on state of nature, social contract and division of powers has immensely been written by both Locke and Kant in their era. REFERENCES CHAPTER TWO MAIN BODY The philosopher emmanuel kant: introduction to profound political thought He was an eighteenth-century philosopher during a period dominated by the ideas of theShow MoreRelatedThe Principles Of Individual Responsibility And Freedom928 Words   |  4 Pagesover the people; telling them that they cannot succeed except under a collective authority instead of being individually motivated and driven to succeed by the principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. On July 4, 1776, a new nation was formed: The United States of America. The principles of individual responsibility and freedom were brought into full swing. The founding fathers wrote the Declaration of Independence; one that will forever stand as an example for all nations who haveRead MoreA Comparative Analysis of the Philosophical Works of Robert Nozick and John Rawls1598 Words   |  6 PagesLiberty and equality have been principles of the Western world in one form or another almost as long as its existence. Today, particularly, these values are held in high regard by those living in this part of the world. It is, therefore, little wonder that these principles have often formed the central line of reasoning in philosophical works. Two examples of these are works by Robert Nozick and John Rawls, both of whom value liberty as the first principle of justice. In their specific argumentsRead MoreThe Right Block Free Speech997 Words   |  4 Pagesonly a form individual freedom bu t it is also a form of freedom from a religious doctrine. If these cartoonists were to not express themselves because they fear they are disrespecting other people’s religion, then they themselves are also giving concessions to the principles of that religion. Thus if one views infringement of liberty by the definitions set through the harm and offense principle, it is clear that the interest of a civil society is to protect freedom of speech not to block or regulateRead MorePrivacy And Security : A Technological World1356 Words   |  6 Pagesexactly the balance lay between personal privacy and national security. In this day and age with terrorism still remaining a very real threat, imagine being in a very similar position to Edward Snowden, except as a software designer being the one individual solely responsible for the creation of software to watch for terrorist behavior. With the proliferation of technology in our everyday lives and due to the invisibility factor discu ssed by James Moor, surveillance on the general population wouldRead MoreFreedom of Speech Mill and Freiberg1505 Words   |  7 PagesMEANINGFUL FREEDOM Freedom of speech is the key element of the real democracies. Freedom of speech is also concerned to the idea that people can speak freely without being stopped, or censored. Freedom of speech is briefly hallmark of democracy because democracy is based on independent thoughts of people. In a democratic society people are allowed to express their views freely and peacefully. There will be no democracy if freedom of speech isnt granted to people. Where there is freedom ofRead More A Theory of Justice Presented by John Rawls Essays1556 Words   |  7 Pagesposition, a hypothetical state where people reason without bias, they would agree to live in a society based on two principles of justice (Rawls 1971, 4). These two principles of justice are named the first and second principles. The first is the equal rights and liberties principle. The second is a combination of the difference principle and the fair equality of opportunity principle, or FEOP (Rawls 1971, 53). Rawls ar gues that inequality will always be inevitable in any society (Rawls 1971, 7). ForRead MoreLiberalism Is Defined by a Desire to Minimise the Role of the State890 Words   |  4 Pagesstate to achieve and uphold its core principles such as individualism and liberty then the frontiers of the state should be rolled back and state power curbed, An example of this is Thomas Jeffersons quote â€Å"an effective gov’t is one who governs least†. A major debate at the heart of liberalism is how to achieve freedom, positive freedom where the state ‘enables and empowers’ the individual to do more and therefore that individual is more free, or negative freedom where the gov’t should be rolled backRead More John Rawls and Political Liberalism Essay1640 Words   |  7 Pagesjust and stable society of free and equal citizens, who remain profoundly divided by reasonable religious, philosophical, and moral doctrines?† (Rawls 4). More specifically, how do the se concepts help to preserve the traditional liberal values of freedom and equality? And do these concepts help to preserve stability within a pluralistic society? John Rawls book, Political Liberalism, addresses the need for the reformation of the unjust democratic constitutional regime. According toRead MoreThe Battle Of The Confederate Flag1321 Words   |  6 Pagesshall be protected as long as they do not cause reasonable harm to another individual. It is incredibly difficult and unjust to promote a system to which state authority prevents speech that they find offensive. It is nearly impossible and impractical for a state entity to understand what can and can’t be considered offensive, and what is offensive to some and not to others. That is why the harm principle is a great principle to understand the limits of how far free speech should and can go. Free speechRead MoreKantian Ethics And The Categorical Imperative Essay1581 Words   |  7 Pagesmorality and ethics, particularly his â€Å"a priori principle† on human rights. Although Kant ultimately developed enlightenment era political theory, many of his vie ws are often seen as bizarre or even controversial at times, particularly in regards his â€Å"a priori principles† of the people and the Categorical Imperative itself. By further analysis of the categorical imperatives and critiques, objections, and the theory’s connections with the â€Å"a priori principles,† Kantian philosophy implication as well as